Intelligence Squared US

TUESDAY, JANUARY 11, 2011

REPEAL OBAMACARE

About This Debate

In March 2010 President Obama signed into law the Affordable Care Act, the biggest overhaul of our health care system in decades.  According to a November poll from the Kaiser Family Foundation, 40 percent of the public would like Congress to expand the new health reform law or leave it as is, while 49 percent are in favor of repealing all or parts of it.  Can the new law reduce the deficit and expand coverage to millions of uninsured Americans, or, as its critics warn, will it actually increase the deficit and fail to control costs that are spiraling out of control?
*All panelists subject to change without notice.

The Panel

For The Motion

  • Douglas Holtz-Eakin
    Douglas Holtz-Eakin
    FOR THE MOTION
    Douglas Holtz-Eakin
    Has a distinguished record as an academic, policy adviser, and strategist. He is currently the president of the American Action Forum and a commissioner on the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. He was the 6th director of the Congressional Budget Office and served as chief economist of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers (2001-2002). He recently served as the director of domestic and economic policy for the John McCain 2008 presidential campaign.
  • John Shadegg
    John Shadegg
    FOR THE MOTION
    John Shadegg
    is a former Republican representative for the 3rd Congressional District of Arizona. He has introduced legislation to promote patient choice, individual ownership and portability in health insurance. His two bills – the Patients Health Care Reform Act and the Health Care Choice Act – offer comprehensive, free-market solutions to health care by allowing individuals to choose a health care plan that best meets their needs.

Against The Motion

  • Jonathan Cohn
    Jonathan Cohn
    AGAINST THE MOTION
    Jonathan Cohn
    Is a senior editor at New Republic, a columnist at Kaiser Health News, and the author of "Sick." He has been called “one of the nation’s leading experts on health care policy” (Washington Post) and “one of the best health care writers out there” (New York Times); he has also won the Sidney Hillman and Harry Chapin media awards. A graduate of Harvard, he is a senior fellow at Demos and member of the National Academy of Social Insurance.
  • Paul Starr
    Paul Starr
    AGAINST THE MOTION
    Paul Starr
    is professor of sociology and public affairs at Princeton University and co-founder and co-editor of the American Prospect magazine, a quarterly about politics, policy, and ideas. He received the 1984 Pulitzer Prize for nonfiction and Bancroft Prize in American history for "The Social Transformation of American Medicine," which is credited for helping to shape the debate about health care reform. He also received the 2005 Goldsmith Book Prize for "The Creation of the Media." During 1993 he served as a senior advisor at the White House in the formulation of the Clinton health plan.

Moderator

John Donvan is an author and correspondent for ABC News. He has served as ABC’s White House Correspondent, along with postings in Moscow, London, Jerusalem and Amman. He is currently writing a book on the history of autism to be published by Crown in 2013.

Poll Results

Pre-Debate Poll Results
17% For | 47% Against | 36%

Post Debate Poll Results
22% For | 72% Against | 6%

Debate Media

Video

Audio

Listen to the edited radio
broadcast of this debate
Listen to the full unedited
audio from this debate

Point/Counterpoint

For

  • Instead of reducing the deficit, the health care act will increase the deficit by $500 billion.
  • The reality is new taxes, higher regulatory burdens for small businesses, and health-care inflation.
  • Millions could lose the insurance they already have and because of Medicare cuts, many seniors will lose access to care.
  • The mandate that all Americans obtain health insurance coverage is unconstitutional.

Against

  • The health care act will reduce the federal deficit by $143 billion over 10 years.
  • The bill will expand coverage to 32 million who are currently uninsured and insurers would not be allowed to deny coverage to children with pre-existing conditions, cancel policies without proving fraud, or put lifetime limits on benefits.
  • Parents can keep children, up to the age of 26, covered on their insurance plans.
  • Exchanges would allow people not covered by their employers to shop for insurance at competitive rates.
  • While not perfect, this is an important first step toward providing universal health care.