<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intelligence Squared US</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intelligencesquaredus.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:34:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The California as First &#8220;Failed State&#8221; Debate: Schwarzenegger, Davis, Whitman, and Jerry Brown</title>
		<link>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/03/the-california-as-first-failed-state-debate-schwarzenegger-davis-whitman-and-jerry-brown/</link>
		<comments>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/03/the-california-as-first-failed-state-debate-schwarzenegger-davis-whitman-and-jerry-brown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>isus-admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligencesquaredus.org/?p=2525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By William Bradley &#8211; March 2, 2010
Is California America&#8217;s first &#8220;failed state?&#8221;&#8230; It&#8217;s a hot topic. You see it suggested in the press. It&#8217;s spinning into the very high-stakes California governor&#8217;s race. There was even a formal debate about it in late January in New York City. Schwarzenegger in particular was very struck by that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By William Bradley &#8211; March 2, 2010<br />
Is California America&#8217;s first &#8220;failed state?&#8221;&#8230; It&#8217;s a hot topic. You see it suggested in the press. It&#8217;s spinning into the very high-stakes California governor&#8217;s race. There was even a formal debate about it in late January in New York City. Schwarzenegger in particular was very struck by that debate, sponsored by Intelligence Squared, as he told me when we talked about it the other day. The event dripped with irony, as it featured Schwarzenegger&#8217;s brother-in-law, Bobby Shriver, as the most prominent member of the team of three arguing that California is America&#8217;s first &#8220;failed state.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/03/the-california-as-first-failed-state-debate-schwarzenegger-davis-whitman-and-jerry-brown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back to Basics on Climate and Energy</title>
		<link>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/back-to-basics-on-climate-and-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/back-to-basics-on-climate-and-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>isus-admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligencesquaredus.org/?p=2475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Andrew Revkin &#8211; February 23, 2010
This time, let’s start with  Michael Crichton, whose name has been invoked quite often in the comment strings here and elsewhere by those challenging the science pointing to disruptive human-driven climate change&#8230; To understand his stance on greenhouse warming, it’s worth going back to the  Intelligence Squared [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Andrew Revkin &#8211; February 23, 2010<br />
This time, let’s start with  Michael Crichton, whose name has been invoked quite often in the comment strings here and elsewhere by those challenging the science pointing to disruptive human-driven climate change&#8230; To understand his stance on greenhouse warming, it’s worth going back to the  Intelligence Squared debate in Manhattan in 2007 on global warming. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/back-to-basics-on-climate-and-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Too Close For Comfort?</title>
		<link>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/too-close-for-comfort/</link>
		<comments>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/too-close-for-comfort/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>isus-admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligencesquaredus.org/?p=2452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[February 12, 2010
Eleven minutes after Israel announced its independence in 1948, President Harry Truman recognized the new state, and American support has been crucial to -Israel&#8217;s survival and a cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy ever since. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>February 12, 2010<br />
Eleven minutes after Israel announced its independence in 1948, President Harry Truman recognized the new state, and American support has been crucial to -Israel&#8217;s survival and a cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy ever since. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/too-close-for-comfort/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Drama of Ideas</title>
		<link>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/the-new-drama-of-ideas/</link>
		<comments>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/the-new-drama-of-ideas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>isus-admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligencesquaredus.org/?p=2431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Erica Abeel &#8211; February 10, 2010
When was the last time you got someone to change their mind about a challenging issue? You know the usual drill. At a dinner party the topic of, say, Israel is broached, and the evening turns toxic. Opposing sides trot out long-held prejudices, opinion posing as fact, or &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Erica Abeel &#8211; February 10, 2010<br />
When was the last time you got someone to change their mind about a challenging issue? You know the usual drill. At a dinner party the topic of, say, Israel is broached, and the evening turns toxic. Opposing sides trot out long-held prejudices, opinion posing as fact, or &#8211; the worst! -statistics. No one even listens to, much less gets convinced by, anyone else. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/the-new-drama-of-ideas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYT Columnist, Former Ambassador Stage Debate</title>
		<link>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/nyt-columnist-former-ambassador-stage-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/nyt-columnist-former-ambassador-stage-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>isus-admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligencesquaredus.org/?p=2417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Marc Tracy &#8211; February 10, 2010
The Intelligence Squared debate series has a cool gimmick: at the beginning, audience members vote on the resolution via little keypads at each seat; at the end, they vote again; whichever side changed the most minds “wins.” As last night’s debate began, it was exciting to find that 25% [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Marc Tracy &#8211; February 10, 2010<br />
The Intelligence Squared debate series has a cool gimmick: at the beginning, audience members vote on the resolution via little keypads at each seat; at the end, they vote again; whichever side changed the most minds “wins.” As last night’s debate began, it was exciting to find that 25% of the crowd voted “undecided,” meaning that many minds were open to persuasion as the four panelists debated the resolution, “The U.S. should step back from its special relationship with Israel.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/nyt-columnist-former-ambassador-stage-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY Audience Votes That “The U.S. Should Step Back from Its Special Relationship with Israel”</title>
		<link>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/ny-audience-vote-that-%e2%80%9cthe-u-s-should-step-back-from-its-special-relationship-with-israel%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/ny-audience-vote-that-%e2%80%9cthe-u-s-should-step-back-from-its-special-relationship-with-israel%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>isus-admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligencesquaredus.org/?p=2414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Gross &#8211; February 10, 2010
Roger Cohen won over New Yorkers by claiming: “Jihadi terrorism aimed at the United States is not primarily motivated perhaps by the Palestinian issue, but it is a major factor.”
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Gross &#8211; February 10, 2010<br />
Roger Cohen won over New Yorkers by claiming: “Jihadi terrorism aimed at the United States is not primarily motivated perhaps by the Palestinian issue, but it is a major factor.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/ny-audience-vote-that-%e2%80%9cthe-u-s-should-step-back-from-its-special-relationship-with-israel%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Audience Decides America Should Step Back From Israel</title>
		<link>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/audience-decides-america-should-step-back-from-israel/</link>
		<comments>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/audience-decides-america-should-step-back-from-israel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>isus-admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligencesquaredus.org/?p=2406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IQ2US Press Release &#8211; February 10, 2010
After the four person debate and a round of thoughtful questions from the audience, the final vote ended with one of the closest results in Intelligence Squared US’s history.  The team arguing in favor of the motion won the night with 49% of the audience voting for them. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IQ2US Press Release &#8211; February 10, 2010<br />
After the four person debate and a round of thoughtful questions from the audience, the final vote ended with one of the closest results in Intelligence Squared US’s history.  The team arguing in favor of the motion won the night with 49% of the audience voting for them.  47% were against the motion and only 4% remained undecided.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/audience-decides-america-should-step-back-from-israel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Israel and America, or Israel and the Palestinians?</title>
		<link>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/israel-and-america-or-israel-and-the-palestinians/</link>
		<comments>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/israel-and-america-or-israel-and-the-palestinians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>isus-admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligencesquaredus.org/?p=2395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Uriel Heilman &#8211; February 10, 2010
What are we talking about when we&#8217;re talking about America&#8217;s special relationship with Israel?  To listen to the panelists at Tuesday night&#8217;s Intelligence Squared debate arguing for the proposition that “The U.S. should step back from its special relationship with Israel,” we&#8217;re talking about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Uriel Heilman &#8211; February 10, 2010<br />
What are we talking about when we&#8217;re talking about America&#8217;s special relationship with Israel?  To listen to the panelists at Tuesday night&#8217;s Intelligence Squared debate arguing for the proposition that “The U.S. should step back from its special relationship with Israel,” we&#8217;re talking about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/02/israel-and-america-or-israel-and-the-palestinians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California: America’s First Failed State</title>
		<link>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/01/california-america%e2%80%99s-first-failed-state/</link>
		<comments>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/01/california-america%e2%80%99s-first-failed-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>isus-admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligencesquaredus.org/?p=2349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[January 26, 2010
In the latest Intelligence Squared US debate, the audience agreed that the Golden State has lost its luster. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>January 26, 2010<br />
In the latest Intelligence Squared US debate, the audience agreed that the Golden State has lost its luster. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/01/california-america%e2%80%99s-first-failed-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debating Gray Davis in New York: California Fails, Wins</title>
		<link>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/01/debating-gray-davis-in-new-york-california-fails-wins/</link>
		<comments>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/01/debating-gray-davis-in-new-york-california-fails-wins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>isus-admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligencesquaredus.org/?p=2338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Sharon Waxman &#8211; January 20, 2010
You could say it wasn’t a fair fight.  With a proposal like, “California is the First Failed State,” the debate on Tuesday seemed a foregone conclusion. Those of us who live in the state and watch the news trot out a litany of funeral announcements for successive state [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Sharon Waxman &#8211; January 20, 2010<br />
You could say it wasn’t a fair fight.  With a proposal like, “California is the First Failed State,” the debate on Tuesday seemed a foregone conclusion. Those of us who live in the state and watch the news trot out a litany of funeral announcements for successive state services – education, medical care for the poor, arts programs, government paychecks – kind of thought it was obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/2010/01/debating-gray-davis-in-new-york-california-fails-wins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
