Intelligence Squared US

Tuesday, April 17

WHEN IT COMES TO POLITICS, THE INTERNET IS CLOSING OUR MINDS

Tuesday, April 17

Reception:5:45 - 6:30 PM

Debate:6:45 - 8:30 PM

NYU Skirball Center
566 LaGuardia Place
at Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012

Tickets:

About This Debate

Does the internet poison politics? It’s been argued that the rise of “personalization,” the use of algorithms to filter what you see online, and easy access to the like-minded, have served to reinforce our pre-conceptions. Is the information bubble a myth, or is it undermining civic discourse? Is the rise of social media really broadening our world views, or narrowing them? *Panelists subject to change.

The Panel

For The Motion

  • Lawrence Lessig
    Lawrence Lessig
    FOR THE MOTION
    Lawrence Lessig
    Internet Law Scholar & Law Professor, Harvard University


    Dubbed a “philosopher king of Internet law,” by The New York Times, Lawrence Lessig is the Director of the Edmond J. Safra Foundation Center for Ethics and a Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. Prior to this he was a Professor of Law at Stanford Law School, where he founded Stanford's Center for Internet and Society. Lessig clerked for Judge Richard Posner on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals and Justice Antonin Scalia on the United States Supreme Court. For much of his academic career, Lessig has focused on law and technology, especially as it affects copyright. He is the author of five books on the subject and has served as lead counsel in a number of important cases marking the boundaries of copyright law in a digital age.

  • Eli Pariser
    Eli Pariser
    FOR THE MOTION
    Eli Pariser
    Author of The Filter Bubble & MoveOn.org Board President


    Eli Pariser is the board president and former executive director of MoveOn.org, which at five million members is one of the largest citizens' organizations in American politics. During his time leading MoveOn, he sent 937,510,800 e-mails to members in his name. He has written op-eds for The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal and has appeared on The Colbert Report, Good Morning America, Fresh Air, and World News Tonight. In his renowned book The Filter Bubble, Pariser reveals how personalization undermines the Internet's original purpose as an open platform for the spread of ideas.

Against The Motion

  • Evgeny Morozov
    Evgeny Morozov
    AGAINST THE MOTION
    Evgeny Morozov
    Foreign Policy Contributing Editor & Author, The Net Delusion


    Currently a visiting scholar at Stanford University and a Schwartz fellow at the New America Foundation, Evgeny Morozov is the author of The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. A contributing editor of and blogger for Foreign Policy magazine, for which he writes the blog Net Effect, Morozov has previously been a Yahoo! fellow at Georgetown University's Walsh School of Foreign Service, a fellow at the Open Society Institute, director of new media at the NGO Transitions Online, and a columnist for the Russian newspaper Akzia. In 2009 he was chosen as a TED fellow where he spoke about how new technology can empower both social change and the policies of repressive regimes.

  • Jacob Weisberg
    Jacob Weisberg
    AGAINST THE MOTION
    Jacob Weisberg
    Chairman & Editor in chief of The Slate Group


    Jacob Weisberg is the editor in chief of The Slate Group, a division of The Washington Post Company. A native of Chicago, he attended Yale University and New College, Oxford. From 1989 until 1994, he worked as a writer and editor at The New Republic. Between 1994 and 1996, he wrote the National Interest column for New York Magazine. In the fall of 1996, he joined Slate as Chief Political Correspondent. He succeeded Michael Kinsley as editor of Slate in 2002. He has also been a Contributing Writer for The New York Times Magazine, a contributing editor of Vanity Fair and a reporter for Newsweek in London and Washington, and a weekly columnist for the Financial Times. In 2007, Min Magazine named him Web Editor of the Year.

Moderator

John Donvan is a correspondent for ABC News Nightline. He has served as ABC White House Correspondent, along with postings in Moscow, London, Jerusalem and Amman.

Debate Poll

<a href="http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/when-it-comes-to-politics-the-internet-is-closing-our-minds/question-2308947/" title="WHEN IT COMES TO POLITICS, THE INTERNET IS CLOSING OUR MINDS">WHEN IT COMES TO POLITICS, THE INTERNET IS CLOSING OUR MINDS</a>
Live debate on Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Point/Counterpoint

For

  • The personalization of the internet—the use of algorithms to filter and individualize our search results—effectively insulates us from opposing points of view, reinforcing our beliefs, and making us more close-minded.
  • Before the internet we relied on gatekeepers to filter the information we received, making sure we got what we should know along with what we wanted to know. But algorithms, unlike newspaper editors, do not adhere to a set of journalistic ethics or a sense of civic responsibility.
  • We are being pushed in the direction of passively receiving information rather than actively seeking it out.

Against

  • The effects of personalization have been overblown. Differences in search results are minor, at most, and Google, the dominant search engine in the U.S., actively works to limit personalization in its algorithms.
  • The internet has opened us up to new sources of information outside of the monopolies—three major news networks and local newspapers— we once relied on.
  • Living in an echo chamber is a choice. With so many so many news sources available, literally at our fingertips, you can’t blame personalization for the narrowing of minds.